| Two
bills, H.B. 1 EX and H.B. 2 EX , relating to indigent defense
were introduced on Monday May 4, 2004 in the Special Session.
The bills were identical. Speaker Terry Coleman, Rep. DuBose
Porter, Rep. Curtis Jenkins, Rep. Randal Mangham, and Rep. Larry
O’Neal are the authors. They introduced 2 identical bills
for procedural reasons. H.B. 1 EX is the bill that is moving
in the process. The House Special Judiciary Committee met on
Monday and Tuesday May 5 and 6, 2004 and made some changes to
H.B. 1 EX. At its Tuesday meeting the committee voted H.B. 1
EX out of committee with a do pass recommendation by committee
substitute. The changes added by the House Special Judiciary
Committee in its committee substitute are indicated in bold
italics.
The following is a summary of the bills:
(1) Article
4 of Chapter 21 of O.C.G.A. Title 15 is amended creating the
Peace Officer, Prosecutor and Indigent Defense Funding Act
and providing a 10% fee on fines and a fee of 10% up to $50
on criminal bonds to fund indigent defense. These fees are
collected by the Superior Court Clerks’ Cooperative
Authority. The House Special Judiciary Committee corrected
the original bill by clarifying in Code Section 15-12-73 that
the 10% fee on fines for ordinance violations only applies
to fines for the violation of criminal ordinances.
(2) O.C.G.A.
§ 15-21A-6 is added providing for a $15 fee on all civil
filings and a $50 application fee for applicants for indigent
defense services to fund indigent defense. The provision regarding
application fees allows lower courts to retain the application
fee. The House Special Judiciary Committee corrected the original
bill by deleting in subsection (b) the provision for the retention
of the application fee by lower courts and by adding a new
subsection (d )that more clearly states that the public entity
providing services in courts not covered by the new system
keeps that application fee.
(3) O.C.G.A.
§ 17-12-10.1 is added creating a General Oversight Committee
for the Standards Council composed of 3 members of the House
appointed by the Speaker, 3 members of the Senate appointed
by the Senate Committee on Assignments or such person or entity
as established by Senate rule, One member of the House appointed
by the Governor, and 1 member of the Senate appointed by the
Governor.
(4) O.C.G.A.
§ 17-12-8 is amended adding a new subsection designated
subsection (c) providing that a minimum standard adopted by
the Standards Council which is determined by the General Oversight
Committee to have a fiscal impact is a guideline until the
minimum standard is enacted by the General Assembly and not
vetoed by the Governor.
(5) O.C.G.A.
§ 17-12-10.1 (e) is added providing that the Standards
Council shall submit its budget to the director of the Office
of Planning and Budget prior to submitting it to the Judicial
Council and gives the Governor the authority to include In
the Governor’s budget report an analysis of the Standards
Council’s budget.
(6) O.C.G.A.
§ 17-12-26 is amended limiting the Standards Council’s
budget request to the amount of funds collected from the new
revenue sources.
(7) O.C.G.A.
§ 17-12-36 (a) is amended allowing the Standards Council
to permit single circuit counties to opt out of the new State
system if the circuit had an indigent defense system in operation
for two years on July 1, 2003 and has a system administered
by the county administrative office of the courts or the court
administrator of the superior court to opt out of the new
State system.
(8) O.C.G.A.
§ 15-21-77 (c) is added providing that opt-out counties
shall receive funds from the council in the amount the Standards
Council would have spent in the circuit for the minimum salary
for number of employees a circuit pubic defender office in
the circuit would have been entitled to have. The House Special
Judiciary Committee corrected the original bill by deleting
the phrase “, except as provided in subsection (c) of
this Code Section” from subsection (b) because the funds
for opt-out counties may come from the new fines and fees
too and will be appropriated through the general appropriations
process just like the funds for the circuit public defender
offices.
(9) O.C.G.A.
§ 17-12-3 is amended prohibiting a prosecuting attorney
from being appointed to the Standards Council.
(10)
O.C.G.A. § 17-12-20 is amended prohibiting a prosecuting
attorney from serving on a circuit public defender selections
panel after July 1st, 2005.
(11)
O.C.G.A. § 17-12-25 (a) is amended to provide the annual
State-paid salary of the circuit public defender is $87,593.58.
(The bill does not state it, but this figure is 90% of the
State salary for a DA.).
(12)
Chapter 21A of O.C.G.A. Title 15 is added providing for the
establishment of the Superior Court Clerks’ Cooperative
Authority as the agency to collect state fees and surcharges
and to monitor the collections of all court fees and surcharges,
(13)
O.C.G.A. § 15-6-94 is amended changing the composition
of the Superior Court Clerks’ Cooperative Authority.
The terms of current members are continued
The authority will ultimately consist of 10 members. Three
members appointed by the Council of Superior Court Clerks.
Four members appointed by the Governor. One member appointed
by the Speaker. One member by the Senate Committee on Assignments
or such person or entity as established by Senate rule. One
member appointed by the Chief Justice. Two of the Council
of Superior Court Clerks appointees, 1 of the Governor’s
appointees and the House and Senate appointees are superior
court clerks. One of the Governor’s appointees is a
county commissioner. The Chief Justices appointee is a superior
court judge.
(14)
O.C.G.A. § § 15-6-77.4, 15-9-60.1,15-21-113, 15-21-132,
15-21-150, and 42-8-34 are amended providing for the collection
of the funds involved by the Superior Court Clerk’s
Cooperative Authority. ( Provisions made obsolete by the new
collection system are deleted: O.C.G.A. § § 15-9-60.1
(b), 15-21-75, 15-21-76, 15-21-114,
15-21-133, 15-21-151)
(15)
O.C.G.A. § 15-6-95 is amended placing the indigent defense
fees in superior court as the 5th priority for payment when
a partial payment is received. The priority for the surcharge
in DUI cases for the state crime victim compensation in the
Code Section was clarified to cover all victims of crime and
not just victims of a DUI offense.
(16)
The Standards Council’s technical amendments are included:
(a) O.C.G.A.
§ 17-12-10.2 providing immunity from civil liability
for the Standards Council and its staff.
(b) O.C.G.A.
§ 17-12-11 providing that 90% of the funds appropriated
for grants to counties shall be distributed to counties.
(c) Article
1A of O.C.G.A. Chapter 17 reinstating prior law for 6 months
to authorize non-GIDC counties to continue to operate an indigent
defense program until December 1, 2005.
(d) O.C.G.A.
§ 17-12-26 eliminating references to the Administrative
Office of the Courts.
(e) O.C.G.A.
§ 17-12-27 adding a new subsection (h) allowing current
public defenders to become part of the new state system without
losing their local retirement benefits.
(f) O.C.G.A.
§ § 17-12-27, 17-12-28, 17-12-29, 17-12-30 deleting
obsolete State Merit System language.
(17)
O.C.G.A. § 17-12-30 (c) (5) was amended to include the
Administrative Office of the Courts as an alternative to the
Department of Administrative Services for administrative support
services.
(18)
Chapter 6 of O.C.G.A. Title 35 is added creating the State
Victim Service Commission.
(19) The House Special Judiciary Committee corrected a typographical
error in the original bill on line 23 of page 34 by changing
the reference from Section 17 to Section 15.
|