Summary of HB 170 (Criminal Justice Act of 2005)
Motion for recusal of judge or motion for new trial
The denial or grant of those motions may be directly appealable
by the State.
The defense may appeal the denial of the motion to recuse
via interlocutory appeal.
Peremptory
challenges
Misdemeanor strikes were reduced from 4 to 3. Felony strikes
were reduced from 12 to 9. Death penalty strikes were reduced
from 20 to 15. The State has an equal number of strikes as
the defense in all of the cases. The order by which each
side exercises its strikes remains the same (the old Code
Section 15-12-166). The number of jurors to be impaneled
remains the same.
The number of alternate jurors will be determined by the
court. The state and the defendant shall be entitled to as
many peremptory challenges to alternate jurors as there are
alternate jurors called.
In cases where 2 or more defendants are tried jointly, the
court may allow the state additional strikes not to exceed
the number of additional strikes as are allowed to the defendants.
A new subparagraph (d) was added to Code Section 15-12-164
which states that the court shall excuse for cause any juror
who from the totality of the juror's answers on voir dire
is determined by the court to be substantially impaired in
the juror's ability to be fair and impartial. The juror's
own representation that the juror would be fair and impartial
is to be considered by the court but is not determinative.
Closing arguments
The State is entitled to both open and conclude regardless
of whether the defense puts in any evidence. The State cannot
waive opening.
In death penalty sentencing hearings, the defense may conclude.
Aggravation evidence
The state must provide to the defense notice of any evidence
in aggravation of punishment 10 days before trial or at such
time the court orders but no later than the beginning of
the trial.
Discovery of death penalty mitigation evidence
If the defendant has opted into the discovery provisions,
then the defense must turn over discovery of mitigation evidence
to the prosecution no later than the return of a guilty verdict.
However, the defense must turn over the witness list 5 days
before trial commences. Any statements made can be turned
over at the return of a guilty verdict.
Impeachment
Any party may attack the credibility of a witness. Any party
may impeach the witness' credibility. Character evidence
in the form of reputation testimony may be brought in if
the defendant testifies and offers evidence of his truthful
character.
Prior convictions may be brought in to impeach the witnesses
including the defendants, if they testify. The prior convictions
must be less than 10 years old; however, that time period
may be calculated from when the defendant is released from
confinement. Also, older convictions can be used if prior
notice is given to the opposing party.
Prior convictions that have been pardoned or annulled are
not admissible if 1) the pardon or annulment was based on
a finding of rehabilitation and the person has not been convicted
of a subsequent felony, and 2) the pardon or annulment was
based on a finding of innocence.
Although juvenile adjudications are not admissible against
the defendant, a witness may be impeached by juvenile adjudications
only if the party seeking to admit the juvenile adjudications
shows the following:
(1) The factual basis for the proven allegations of delinquency
would have constituted a crime under the laws of the state
of the juvenile court if committed by an adult at the time
they were committed by the juvenile:
(2) The probative value of the evidence substantially outweighs
the prejudicial effect of its admission; and
(3) The court finds that admission of the adjudication into
evidence is necessary for a fair determination of the issue
of guilt or innocence of the defendant.
The fact that there is an appeal pending on a conviction
does not make the conviction inadmissible.
Expansion of Rape Shield
The
rape shield law was expanded to cover all the sexually
violent offenses defined in O.C.G.A. § 42-1-12 (rape,
aggravated sodomy, aggravated child molestation, and aggravated
sexual battery).
Effective Date for the bill
The
act will become effective for all trials commencing on
or after 7/1/05.
|